An SCC Recursive Meta-Algorithm for Computing Preferred Labellings in Abstract Argumentation
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper presents a meta-algorithm for the computation of preferred labellings, based on the general recursive schema for argumentation semantics called SCC-Recursiveness. The idea is to recursively decompose a framework so as to compute semantics labellings on restricted sub-frameworks, in order to reduce the computational effort. The meta-algorithm can be instantiated with a specific “base algorithm”, applied to the base case of the recursion, which can be obtained by generalizing existing algorithms in order to compute labellings in restricted sub-frameworks. We devise for this purpose a generalization of a SAT-based algorithm, and provide an empirical investigation to show the significant improvement of performances obtained by exploiting the SCCrecursive schema.
منابع مشابه
A SCC Recursive Meta-Algorithm for Computing Preferred Labellings in Abstract Argumentation
This paper presents a meta-algorithm for the computation of preferred labellings, based on the general recursive schema for argumentation semantics called SCC-Recursiveness. The idea is to recursively decompose a framework so as to compute semantics labellings on restricted sub-frameworks, in order to reduce the computational effort. The meta-algorithm can be instantiated with a specific “base ...
متن کاملZJU-ARG: A Decomposition-Based Solver for Abstract Argumentation
Argumentation Qianle Guo and Beishui Liao 1 Center for the Study of Language and Cognition, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, P.R.China 2 University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg Abstract. This paper gives the system description of a solver for abstract argumentation ZJU-ARG submitted to the First International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation (ICCMA’15). It adopts a decompo...
متن کاملComputing Preferred Labellings by Exploiting SCCs and Most Sceptically Rejected Arguments
The computation of preferred labellings of an abstract argumentation framework (or briefly, AF) is generally intractable. The existing decomposition-based approach by exploiting strongly connected components (SCCs) of a general AF is promising to cope with this problem. However, the efficiency of this approach is highly limited by the maximal SCC of an AF. This paper presents a further solution...
متن کاملExploiting Parallelism for Hard Problems in Abstract Argumentation: Technical Report
Abstract argumentation framework (AF ) is a unifying framework able to encompass a variety of nonmonotonic reasoning approaches, logic programming and computational argumentation. Yet, efficient approaches for most of the decision and enumeration problems associated to AF s are missing, thus potentially limiting the efficacy of argumentation-based approaches in real domains. In this paper, we p...
متن کاملOn Learning Attacks in Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation
Probabilistic argumentation combines the quantitative uncertainty accounted by probability theory with the qualitative uncertainty captured by argumentation. In this paper, we investigate the problem of learning the structure of an argumentative graph to account for (a distribution of) labellings of a set of arguments. We consider a general abstract framework, where the structure of arguments i...
متن کامل